Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Well, someone thought it was. BIN was just hit. Wasn't up long. If it comes back from PSA as authentic, someone hit the jackpot. If not, file claim with Paypal!
what basis would the buyer have for the claim ? item not as described ? if you'll note , in the description he said he was selling it as a reprint instead of an authentic card despite his friends opinion that it was real....
personally , based solely on comparisons to my own 52's , i'd say the card does look legit....obviously without seeing it in person though i wouldn't stake my reputation on it.....
fwiw , i think the only reason ebay allowed the item to be listed was because he noted that he is considering it a reprint.....why you may ask ? simple - the 52 mantle is one of a handful (9 i believe) cards that ebay no longer allows to be listed in ungraded form....
ok...found the actual list on ebay :
You can list the following trading cards only if they've been professionally graded by a reputable grading company:
* 1909 Cy Young (T206)
* 1909 Eddie Plank error card (T206)
* 1909 Honus Wagner (T206)
* 1909 Ty Cobb (T206)
* 1933 Babe Ruth (Goudey #53, #80, #144, and #181)
* 1933 Lou Gehrig (Goudey #92 and #160)
* 1951 Mickey Mantle (Bowman #253)
* 1952 Mickey Mantle (Topps #311)
* 1966-1967 Bobby Orr rookie card (Topps #35)
* 1979-1980 Wayne Gretzky rookie card (O-***-Chee and Topps #18)
* 1986-1987 Michael Jordan rookie card (Fleer #57)
Unbelievable it's come to this.
The GOD ebay has spoken ! Unbelievable it's come to this.
Fortunately I can still sell my fake $100 Ripken traded rookie there. Have two of them if anyone's interested ?
Very interesting reading.................Doubt that I ever see one, but still, clever the way folks will try to "put it" to you..................Glad I don't go that far back in my set collecting.................
i agree....
while i do understand their INTENT , i really don't care for their METHOD regrading this....
This is very informative and detailed. Nicely done piece. I agree with you that the card is most likely fake, but which way can you tell? Was there something that jumped out at you? I read the link entirely, but I couldn't find any of the flaws mentioned. Juts noticed that the winning bidder didn't pay and the card is back up for auction again.
I see several flaws, as outlined in the article I cited. Black borders(upper left especially) looked suspicious to my eyes, and the whiteness of the card in deference to its "aged" appearance are red flags, and the almost near perfection of the rounded corners, top & bottom, in seemingly equal wear, is highly doubtful. Description has image with ruler on both edges of card- it's correctly sized so corners wore but the bottom did minimally?....
For me, when looking at anything vintage, any red flags at all are enough to say no thanks. And frankly, a seller, with this type of card, with so low feedback AND the descriptive story always make me go Hmmmm..